The frugal photographer strikes again. Time for zoom.

My recent switch to a Pentax K-3ii has been a success. Next up? A zoom.


Note: I also had always wanted a body with a topside LCD, in body image stabilization, dual front and back dials, and 2 memory card slots. No camera I owned had that combination of features, but the K-3ii had them all with a many buttoned control layout I really liked as a bonus.

Specifically a zoom lens that has tripped up a number of systems for your humble frugal shopper.  A 70-200mm f2.8. Why? Glad you asked. A recap via my system journey in chronological order.

Prices below as of the writing of this post from B&H Photo Video. Best APS-C (except the E-M1) camera and least expensive lens combo that brings IS, with the A7 solution thrown in for comparison’s sake.

Olympus: E-M1 ($1,099) + 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO ($1,399) = $2,498

Nikon: D7200 ($1,096) + Tamron 70-200mm VC f/2.8 ($1,399) = $2,495

Samsung: NX1 ($1,299) + 50-150mm f/2.8 ($1,599) = $2,898

Sony: A7 ($1,098) + 70-200mm f/4 ($1,498) = $2,596

And now this:

Pentax: K-3ii ($979) + Tamron 70-200mm Di ($769) = $1,748

Body and lens combined is $648 less than the VR Nikon 70-200mm alone at $2,396. And I paid even less as I caught a body on sale and traded for $825. Another route to new is to pickup the very similar K-3. You lose GPS, but you ‘gain’ a flash. While I do not plan to tag files with location nor do I plan to use the astrotrace feature for star shots it is nice to have the option so I chose the ii.

I will not quibble about best tool for task, etc., etc. After dancing through a few systems and sensor sizes I firmly believe any modern system can meet my needs.

Some gifts. Some second hand screaming deals that fell into my lap. One new. Have owned pocket, 1", MFT, APS-C, and full frame digital cameras. Have owned many 35mm, now medium, and years ago Polaroid film cameras. Have owned many brands not represented here. Have owned multiple mirrorless systems. Have owned a couple DSLR systems. None of that matters. Ultimately I love no brand, format, form factor, or technology. I will walk away from any debate regarding these insignificant details. I love photography. My only devotion is to capturing light. I am a novice that thrills at learning. A few good captures and many more bad along the way. What I use to do so matters little as long as I can continue to do so. #film #35mm #mediumformat #photography

A photo posted by Eric Woods (@ericlwoods) on

Another admission. I had a Tamron 28-75mm for the D3300 that I liked quite a bit so I had no 3rd party apprehensions.

Tamron 70-200mm Di on Pentax K-3ii

Tamron 70-200mm Di on Pentax K-3ii

I have had the lens only 5 days and I am already impressed. Lastly here are some pros, cons, and a gallery:


  • Excellent optics like the Tamron 28-75mm I had for Nikon some time ago.
  • Not a true macro as marked, but with a close focus distance of 51.2″(1.30m) at 200mm it does a great quasi-macro impression. Check out water drops on leaf shot in gallery.
  • One would expect great low light performance given the specs and it does not disappoint. Band shots in gallery were taken in a dimly lit gymnasium on a rainy day with the windows blocked and I had no issue getting bright, clear shots across the gym.
  • Also as one would expect with these specs it is a great portrait lens.
  • Focuses very quickly with little to no hunting on the K-3ii.
  • f/2.8, in body stabilization, teamed with the 3 center vertical -3EV focus points means low light is of little challenge.
  • It is light compared to other like spec’d lenses.
  • I really like the quality of the bokeh this lens creates.
  • Acceptably sharp at f/2.8 and tack sharp starting at f/3.8 – f/4 and up.
  • Comes with a nice lens bag and a sturdy tripod collar.
  • Great value.


  • Pull focus ring manual focus switch falls victim to 3rd party one design for many mounts issue since Pentax has an on body switch that must also be switched. As a result switching to manual focus and back is a 2 step, albeit quick, process. It is of no consequence personally since I have yet to miss focus using AF.
  • AF by body screw drive is noisy compared to newer in body focus drive systems, but it has not been an issue for me. I imagine it would be an issue if there was a lot of hunting, but that has not been the case here.
  • That is about it.



Random Neural Firing from FB yesterday: The Struggle Against Disenfranchisement.

We are in an era where foolishness is treated as if it were a valid viewpoint for viewer market share, intellectual sloth and insensitivity are running rampant, spewing lies and hatred is met with howls of approval and labeled by some as telling the truth, and stating the patently obvious is celebrated as if it were a deep revelation. Already turned in my cable boxes to cut down on the noise, but my interwebs are infected with this nonsense as well. Parsing actual news from the nonsense is an exhausting affair, but that is the point. Disgust those who want better to the point of disenfranchisement. But I will continue to sift through this cesspool of misinformation, malfeasance, commercial breaks, and breathless bluster called major modern media so as to stay informed enough to properly exercise that one right that has yet to be revoked. My right to vote. If we do not do this the moneyed interests and the lobbyists, politicians, and media outlets they have bought will have won by default. An uphill battle, but the only losing is in surrendering the polls by not showing up. -ELW

It all started innocently with giving my Dad a camera… Pentax K-3ii

You see what happened was…

In the beginning, for me photography wise, was my father’s Pentax ME Super. Sure he had cameras before that many years ago and I also had my own Polaroid One Step (to keep me off of his SX-70 to be sure), but the ME Super was a turning point. I liked photography before that, but I fell in love with the process of preparing, taking the photo, getting the photos developed, and the anticipation. That camera is why I keep a number of film cameras to this day. As I am brand agnostic I regularly churn through different systems as whim, preference, and trade values dictate. Up until recently I was on a decidedly Sony jag having acquired a recent price dropped A7, and a few lenses. All was well in the land. Then my father decided to take his Pentax ME Super out of storage (I primarily ran a roll through it now and again) for a trip he and my mother were taking to Vegas which included a Grand Canyon excursion. This started an unexpected chain of events that brought me back to Pentax.

Dad's Pentax ME Super

First roll of film went well for my father, but I was saddened to hear that things did not go so well after that. The mirror locked in the up position, the shutter would not press, and the camera could no longer be loaded or advanced as he attempted the second roll of film. Not surprising as this camera has many years and miles on it. As anyone would have standing at the Grand Canyon he then soldiered on with his camera phone. When he returned it was diagnosed as a shot board by Southeastern Camera, Carrboro. Nostalgia set aside it was time to punt. My father had been thinking of getting a DSLR, but did not want to spend a lot so I asked what they had second hand and they had a Pentax K-10 D in good condition with a zoom lens and battery grip for a song.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

A main perk is that my father would be able to use his existing lenses and flash. Cool. I bought the camera as a gift and brought it to him that night. Here is the thing. I liked the handling of the camera so much that I could not put it down. Many controls were right on the camera and very well placed. Then I realized that this camera had sensor based image stabilization, like I enjoyed on my Olympus cameras, so all lenses would benefit. It was weather resistant. It had an LCD screen on top like I had been wanting. All this and more impressed me and when I arrived home that night I immediately started perusing the internets for a second hand Pentax of my own. Once I realized how reasonably priced they were I decided to see if I could trade some gear for a K-3 or K-3ii body. Sure enough I could at Southeastern Camera, Raleigh and I ended up with a new K-3ii and only paying out of pocket for tax and the price of a $95 50mm f1.8 lens I bought to go along with it.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Soon after that same week I picked up a second hand sample of the older, discontinued version of the Pentax DA 55-300mm lens for a great price. A good start. If you have read any of my posts you already know that I believe all modern cameras systems to be quite  competent. Trying out systems long term to see whether I will keep them or not and I have been through a few is a great time.  Not a bad thing to say about any, but I do have preferences. Here are my thoughts on the K-3ii so far:

  • I love thoughtful design and construction (why I hold an Industrial Engineering degree) and will always choose form over fashion. The K-3ii is not a flashy DSLR, or a part of the current mirrorless movement (that I think is great), but in hand it feels hewn from granite. As an added plus the plethora of button and dial controls I loved on my father’s K-10D that keep menu diving to a minimum are carried over to this latest Pentax.
  • I prefer tangible benefits for my purposes over bragging rights. Put simply I loved saying I had a full frame camera, but realized day to day benefits were few for my use.
  • The oft cited DSLR size issue as compared to mirrorless did not really pan out for me in the real world. On paper it sounded great, but having owned/used very capable small mirrorless cameras (E-PL5, E-P5, and NX300) in the end I found them to be a tight jacket pocket fit while being small-ish handling wise when I wanted to flex the prodigious control capabilities these advanced cameras offered. Likely, at least in part, owing to the beef mitts I inherited from my father. A better way I found was a recent decision to pick up a capable second hand fixed lens camera for day to day portability. and put size on a back burner for my main camera. Also the K-3ii is fairly compact in it’s own right when compared to the:
    • Sony A7: I love this camera and in the body only K-3ii size comparison contest the A7 gets the compactness award by a good measure. But with that larger sensor larger lenses are required. Even with the smallest FA prime lens attached, the FA 35mm f2.8, the A7 body size advantage starts losing ground pretty quickly. Still not large or heavy by any measure, but the compact descriptor becomes a bit of a stretch depending upon the lens you use.
    • Samsung NX1: At one point I was 2 bodies deep in to Samsung’s camp. The natural progression should have been the NX1, but I rarely shoot video so the 4K advantage was not that much of a draw for me. Plus I was fine with the NX30. But looking back at this camera I was surprised to see that there is little to no size difference between the mirrorless NX1 and the DSLR K-3ii.
  • If there is anything I miss from my Olympus days it is definitely in body image stabilization. Present on my Dad’s K-10D and on my K-3ii and I have been impressed with the performance of both.
  • Low light. While the A7 is not up to the performance of it’s A7S and A7RII brothers I thoroughly enjoyed the low light performance of the A7 paired with the Mitakon 50mm f0.95. Along with subject isolation it was a strong reason for me hanging on to the A7. That being said K-3ii features provided a surprisingly competent (unexpected) alternative to the A7/Mitakon’s low light performance.
    • Three center stacked, vertical low light cross type sensors allow the K-3ii to focus in jaw droppingly low light situations with relative ease. Last night I was able to focus on the shadow side of a lens sitting on a table only lit by a TV screen across the room. From Ricoh: “Three of the sensors are f2.8 type line sensors; one is located at the center, a second directly above the center and one directly below.”
    • Combine this with the in body image stabilization, a firm grasp, and a reasonably fast lens (the plastic fantastic $95 DA 50mm f1.8  in this case) the results are impressive even in a room that is nearly dark (forgive the mess). Light on left of lens is coming from the TV. Light in background is coming from hallway lights quite a distance away. The view with the naked eye was nowhere near this bright.

      f1.8, 1/8 sec., ISO 3200

      f1.8, 1/8 sec., ISO 3200

    • Worthy of it’s own bullet to mention again this is all with autofocus.
  • The bogey. I enjoyed the D3300 I had a great deal, but ultimately it was the D7200 I really wanted DSLR wise. In fact I have been tracking the used D7200/D7100 market for some time now waiting for a deal to appear.
    • For my purposes he K-3ii matches D7200 features I was looking for:
      • Dual SD Card slots
      • LCD screen
      • Front and back control dials
      • Weather sealed
      • APS-C 24MP
      • Access to Tamron lenses among others
    • while adding a few advantages

While I could go on one of the main reasons for my move is quite subjective. Perhaps there is some latent loyalty from my childhood, but from the moment I picked up the K-10D there has been little to no searching for anything and the layout lends itself to one concentrating on taking pictures. It feels like a film camera that progressed organically to it’s present digital conclusion rather than an electronics device shaped like a camera. I simply enjoy shooting with the K-3ii.  Will this continue to be the case? Way too early. Time will tell, but so far it looks good. Here are some sample shots. -ELW

Daughter-ism: Keep trying the key…

Sometimes wisdom is handed down from elders. Sometimes it is caught as a part of living. Other times it is taught by observing those we are entrusted with teaching.

Hasselblad 501c

Hasselblad 501c

We have a door that a young child inserted a branch in to years ago. As a result we could not get a piece of the branch out and the lock was jammed. It was not essential to enter in to that door from the outside so it had been long ago put on a backburner and left. Recently we had a need to gain entry through this door on a regular basis. A locksmith had installed the lock when we moved in and we made plans to call so he could match the keys as he had done before. At this point our daughter says, “The key worked when I tried it again yesterday.”…

Say what now? We tried and sure enough it now opened without issue. The only thing I can figure is that so much time passed that the branch deteriorated to the point that the lock was no longer jammed. Who knows how long ago we could have opened the door. The thought struck me immediately:

We had determined in our mind years ago that the lock was irretrievably jammed and the door would never open again until we did something. We believed this so thoroughly that we never tried the lock again. It would not open because we needed to do something. After enough time passed the lock was no longer jammed, but we never realized it because we stopped trying the key. In her youthful optimism my daughter tried the key again without hesitation and the door opened.

Keep trying the key.

I immediately found this revelation useful in my life. Often times action is required in life but it is also true that time is a crucial element for change. There are times where doors will not open for no other reason than the fact that it is not time yet. It does not mean the door will not ever open. It does not mean that there is something we did not do. It does not mean there is something we need to do. Sometimes the best solution is having the patience to not force the lock and permanently break it (as I almost did initially), but instead simply wait for the blockages to clear when and as they were meant to so we can open the door without forcing it or adding unnecessary expense. In the grand scheme the door not opening was not even an issue because we did not need to use it when it was jammed. The only issue would be the jam itself if we chose to obsess on that alone. In the end the only thing required of us was to wait until we needed to get through the door and then try the key.