New California bills will provide free, digital textbooks to university students
Recently I posted some ramblings regarding Android and the new iPhone. (In short, you don’t like iOS6 maps?… give waze a try until Apple works out some of the kinks or Google releases an app.) I also commented on how when I held the iPhone 5 in hand I was impressed by the build quality (I am an Industrial Engineer by degree after all), fluidity of the user interface, and the efficiency and accuracy of Siri as compared to my Galaxy Nexus 4.0 baked in, after market and bootleg options.
Current weapon of choice
Now mind you I like my Nexus. On it’s own it has been my best phone to date and up until the iPhone 5 offered features exclusive to Android:
- attach photos in such in email
- 16:9 aspect ratio screen
- larger than a 3.5″ screen
- DWIW – My abbreviation of do what I wanna, e.g. buying media content where I wanna, using adobe flash content if I wanna. None of which are show stoppers. Just as a rule when I am paying my hard earned cash my initial reaction is to recoil from seemingly unnecessary and intrusive constraints.
- Free turn by turn navigation.
- Price. Very importantly to a man on a budget Android tended to be the more frugal choice. Not just the phone, but the accessories as well.
- NFC compatibility.
See here’s the problem
A truth wielded with malice cuts as deeply as a lie.
Usually anything easily obtained is not worth having. -RLW
A lot of virtual ink is being spilled over the iOS6 Maps inaccuracies, but please note these facts:
1 It’s free. It’s a day old. Relax.
2. Google will likely come to the rescue w/ an app soon, unless they just do not want to gain it’s Apple users back.
3. Apple will likely fix it swiftly.
4. Lastly, there is waze (www.waze.com). A free GPS app w. social alerts. Think high tech. version of flashing your headlights when you notice oncoming drivers flying in to a constables trap. (If there are any law enforcement representation reading this I am speaking hypothetically and not making any suggestions.)
Learning when to let go. You can not move forward to get what has been set aside for you by continuing to fall back and chase that which was meant to be left behind. Choose. Forward or backwards, while keeping in mind that truth be told turning back will eventually leave you empty handed in the end once again. So the only real choice is forward.
I find it notable that Romney’s 47% comment or ‘gaffe’ did not require posing as a pimp (Acorn), a soundbite editing sideswipe (Sherrod), or any other devious tactics to manifest itself. Just a room full of Romney’s peers and an opportunity to speak his mind.
Since childhood two past times of mine are following politics and attempting to understand that which at first seems incomprehensible. Together these occupy a good deal of my pondering time. Since I was a child my father and I would have interesting conversations wherein he would use current affairs to implore me to look past surface rhetoric in order to glimpse the hidden agendas that lie beneath. For example:
Q: Why would news agencies insist upon discussing percentage numbers when elections are decided by electoral votes? Have we learned nothing from the 2000 election cycle? Bush had 50,456,002 votes for 47.87%, but Gore had 50,999,897 and 48.38%, but still lost because the electoral breakdown was Bush/271 and Gore/267. So why would we not instead concentrate on electoral votes?
A. The real story is not an exciting one. Obama is and has been ahead of Romney in the electoral contest. Facts are boring to many. Painting the contest to make it seem like a real nail biter scares the mess out of both sides and sells more ad space.
“According to a CNN/ORC International Poll released Monday, 52% of likely voters nationwide back the president, compared to 46% for Romney.”
This sells more papers and pays for more stage lights and bronzer even though that poll gap is gigantic compared to polls taken 2 and 4 weeks ago where the race seemed much closer… by percentage points because the electoral breakdown was virtually parked at near the same numbers as in the image above. No change in the story? Boring. Percentage points it is.
See. Question and an answer that is not so obvious at first glance. A cynical capitalism over clear information narrative perhaps, but it makes sense. This makes me happy. Another example:
Q. We see it all of the time, but why would anyone waste every ones time with legislation that is redundant at best or impossible to enforce at it’s worst?
A. Campaign fund raising rhetoric, endearing ones self to their demographic while simultaneously kicking sand in the face of the perceived ‘enemy’ so a trumped up list of accomplishments can be manufactured. Ineffectual or not on paper I did something.
That is all fine and good and I have more examples, but I will spare your time.
Side bar: To my dismay I came of voting age in the time of Dukakis vs. Big Poppa Bush. Eesh, such a choice. All my young life I had waited for the day that I could honor the memories of those that came before me and cast my vote declaring, in the memory of MLK, “Give us the ballot!”… And then I have to choose between Bush and Dukakis. So I registered Independent and let my voice be heard. Have yet to vote independent, but neither side spoke to me at that point of my life.
Moving on. The current issue for me is that there is one question unanswered. A matter where I cannot for the life of me pin down a feasible underlying motive.
Q. The Republicans have a certain set of demographics that will never vote for Obama. Never. Will they ever vote for Obama. I have certain theories on the why, but one cannot fathom fully what lies in the heart of man. That is another discussion for another day. The point today is that it would seem that the Republicans seem stuck. Stuck on what? Glad you asked. Stuck on pandering to the electorate they already have in pocket. Since they have those already in pocket why do they not even feign interest in broadening their appeal, even if it is for pure political motive?
Every news cycle comes with news that they have thumbed the very groups in the eye that they need to move forward. Now I am not saying that I want Romney to win. I do not for reasons too numerous to state here. Even his own party does not really seem to back him. No I am speaking purely from an analytical standpoint. The only logical conclusion I can come to so far is that the Republicans looked at their slate of candidates and decided to punt this election cycle in hopes of putting forward a more palatable option next time around. I am not convinced yet. But many do look as if they are just going through the motions to appease the GOP machine. Does the very thought of the aftermath and potential long term damage to their party of a Romney/Ryan win scare them like it does many outside the party? Hm. More pondering ahead.
Perhaps like the getting to the center of a tootsie pop conundrum of years ago, “The world may never know.”
“…If we want to win the battle of ideas in the long term, we should be willing to face the fact that Mitt Romney is likely to lose — and should, given that he’s neither a true conservative nor a courageous moderate. He’s just an ambitious man. Nothing wrong with that, except when you want to be president.”
Joe Scarborough, former congressman, MSNBC host and POLITICO columnist